RTW programs critical to
reining in injury costs
Abstract
from CTD News: May 2008, Vol. 17 No. 5
In a time of rapidly
rising production costs and a slumping economy, employers cannot afford to have
injured workers off the job for extended periods of time. As a solution, many businesses
are placing an increasingly significant focus on developing and maintaining
return-to-work initiatives. These programs not only help employers lower workers’
comp costs and reduce lost time, but they also eliminate the possibilities for
fraud and malingering by providing opportunities for injured employees to
continue to do productive work while they are recovering. We recently sat down
with Cindy Roth, CEO of Ergonomic Technologies Corp. consulting firm in
CTDNews:
Why are RTW programs so essential in today’s
workers’ comp environment?
Cindy Roth: In
a lot of companies today, there’s a belief that workers’ compensation is there
to pay for workers’ comp injuries — rightly so. However, this should not be
part of the normal “cost of doing business.” RTW processes, if developed
correctly, are essential because they bring the injured employee back to a job
that will not create additional or prolonged injuries. Without this, it will
mean a loss of profit for the company, and pain and suffering for the injured
employee. Many employers don’t realize that costs to productivity are four
times the medical expenses for injured or sick employees.
CTDNews:
What common mistakes do employers make when
implementing an RTW program or attempting to bring an injured employee back to
the job?
Roth: Most
companies do not have good return-to-work policies. For example, when an
employee goes out with workers’ comp injury or illness, the employee is returned
to the same job, which might have contributed to the initial injury. However,
management is often not aware of what jobs affect what body parts. In addition,
local physicians and health care systems are often not familiar with the
employee’s job requirements. Therefore, it is easier for them to write work restrictions
that might not allow the employee to be as productive as he can be. Ergonomic
workplace assessments and job safety assessments are an essential part of any
good RTW policy. While the employee is off the job, trained personnel should go
to the work site and evaluate which part of the job methodology, tools or
equipment affected the injured body part. The goal of the RTW policy should
reflect identifying the injured body part and placing the employee on a job
that does not compromise that body part. When designing work methodologies, it
is also important to share the musculoskeletal risks with a variety of muscle
groups to eliminate the high risk factors to one group of soft tissue, such as
muscles, tendons, ligaments and nerves. In addition, employers should
familiarize local health care providers with jobs through video or by inviting
them into the facilities to observe the jobs being performed.
CTDNews:
How should RTW be incorporated into a company’s
workers’ comp program? In other words, what departments should be working
together, and how can all of a company’s health, safety, ergo and comp elements
join forces to work toward the common goal of bringing the injured employee
back to the job?
Roth: One
word answer — teamwork. First, common goals need to be established for any team
to work together and be successful. For the integration of a successful RTW
process into the existing workers’ comp or human resources function, everyone
who is involved must understand, agree to the need, and set realistic goals for
the RTW process incorporation. It is crucial to work with the safety and health
department, HR, supervisors and employee reps to begin identifying jobs that
are creating workers’ comp claims, and looking at jobs that can be used in the
RTW process. Buy-in and compliance with the RTW plan is also critical. Now we
really get to the “how to.” Management must be committed to providing
accommodations and assisting in the return to gainful employment. With this,
you also need written procedures, which reinforce roles and responsibilities
for all parties to the process, time frames for participation in the program,
accountability for implementation, and a system to track outcomes.
Communication
is important
When an injured
employee is off the job for too long, the likelihood of return is diminished,
according to Cindy Roth, CEO of Ergonomic Technologies Corp. in